InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 2799
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/17/2010

Re: None

Sunday, 03/13/2011 9:30:20 AM

Sunday, March 13, 2011 9:30:20 AM

Post# of 105534
LOI states shareholders will pay upwards of $5.5m to settle CCEL->CMEX contractual agreement in this current lawsuit. Right? Are you willing to vote "Yes" to a RS and AS to forfeit $5.5m to settle this CCEL litigation?

My vote is "No" to a RS and an AS increase.

The parties’ binding Letter of Intent provides among other things for:

-A maximum purchase price of $17.84 million, plus agreement to assume and pay up to $5.5 million in potential liabilities of the business acquired which are contingent on future events, and less a sum representing 90 days of net operating capital for the business acquired.
http://edgar.brand.edgar-online.com/displayfilinginfo.aspx?FilingID=7597835-3594-9048&type=sect&TabIndex=2&companyid=634207&ppu=%252fDefault.aspx%253fcompanyid%253d634207%2526amp%253bformtypeID%253d135

Let's review that China business model again:
The answer can be found by turning back to the earliest investment model in which “banks were used to pay for banks.”

Why are shareholders on the hook for $17.84M in a CMEX deal that nets how much today according to the CCEL filings? Out of the $17.84M management is saying shareholders are willing to pay upwards of $5.5M to CCEL to resolve this CMEX-CCEL litigation (DAMAGES). What the heck is going on here?!
http://english.caijing.com.cn/2008-03-07/100051309.html
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.