InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,266.95
(
-0.74%
)
US TECH 100
18,178.00
(
-1.14%
)
Dow Jones
38,441.54
(
-1.06%
)
Brent Oil
83.51
(
0.16%
)
Bitcoin
67,606.32
(
0.03%
)
Post# of 118239
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

frogdreaming

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 10
Posts 4220
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/10/2003

frogdreaming

Re: Salm7 post# 93316

Friday, 02/25/2011 10:43:26 PM

Friday, February 25, 2011 10:43:26 PM

Post# of 118239
The case in point is exactly the opposite of what you are spinning.

Someone tried to transfer his shares to a broker who was not trading those shares due to the global lock and would not accept them.

The immediate spin from the gallery was to condemn the original broker for not 'allowing' them to be 'released'.

It was nonsense then, it is nonsense now.

If a broker will not trade the shares, they do not have to accept the shares. The poster tried to transfer the shares to 'Option- Express' who would not accept them due to the global lock.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=60255677

Don't try to spin the facts.



Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up