wbmw: I find it hard to believe that among all of the self-proclaimed industry experts on this board, nobody knows anything about strained silicon. Lack of knowledge sure has not kept anyone from speculating about AMD's possible problems with SOI. In the transition to 90nm, Intel will be incorporating strained silicon and low-k. All of this will be happening at a time when the 130nm process is completely topped out, Hammer will (ostensibly) be in production, and there will be great pressure to get the 90nm process going. Personally, I think that it will be a very difficult transition and will present a significant risk for Intel's position in the CPU market. I was curious about what others felt.
...since every single one of your posts seem obsessed with exposing some kind of bias.
If you actually believe this, then you really have not read my posts. I definitely admit that I have thrown some jabs before, but in almost every instance, I was provoked by some insult or personal affront. Additionally, I need not expose a bias. The bias is obvious, yet expected. This is, after all, an Intel message board. Of course there is an Intel bias. However, I noted, as others have also, that much of the conversation is given to denigrating AMD rather than discussing Intel. What's it to you if I choose to point this out?
If you want to have a discussion, why don't you just start one, instead of complaining all the time?
I have started and participated in many discussions here. Somehow you seem to overlook that. I also question your motives for posting this kind of dialogue in public when you could just as easily have PM'ed me as you have before. You point out what you call my obsessions, yet you seem obsessed with pointing out what you perceive to be my character flaws. That's mighty big of you.
