InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 327
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/06/2009

Re: SYTI post# 12921

Wednesday, 02/23/2011 12:15:49 PM

Wednesday, February 23, 2011 12:15:49 PM

Post# of 13553
Ya, i remember you digging that up a while back. Good job. But when i called the company, they told me they didn't have to start all over. But they didn't want to divulge, because they didn't want the enemy to know how to get around it. (always better to catch them off guard)

i'm glad to see them acknowledge the court case in a PR. They have to be accountable for any info they release through the wire.

I agree with you, the focus needs to be on corporate affairs, but this is pertinent info. Those 6 million shares coming into market illegally is the main reason everyone's investment tanked. Its relevant info.

again, if the defendants were served and did not fight it, there is an automatic default ruling.

Does anyone think Joel Gardne'rs car dealer in London Ontario really wants to fight the Delaware Courts re free shares the car dealer was issued ? The car dealer doesn't want to get involved, This is not his fight and he has no understanding of what it is he is fighting. Although his car dealer was issued shares of MEVT, i do not know if this is fact. This is only my opinion.(but im usually right.lol)

All lasting business is built on friendship.
Alfred A. Montapert

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.