Moosh, I don't mean to be presumptuous. I just can't imagine that with Yuma happening, all of the hoops that Clark, et. al., are legally and successfully jumping through, the personal cash investments of our management, the cash investment by our engineering partner Eastcor (who, by the way, should know exactly who provided the electronics package and what connections they provide or they wouldn't have risked 100K), that 2 + 2 doesn't add up to 4. You know what I mean?
Forget the "We've been down this path before and look where it's gotten us" argument. Flush it. It has no relevance anymore. (not saying you said that, others pound on it like it's a ritual) This is not your father's Buick. This is a company with viable and timely products that is on the verge of public success with a team of experienced, professional, successful people who are in it to win it. I say public success because we aren't privy to the intimate details of the progress. So, how do I know there's progress? Obviously, they have a ship that's ready for military eyes because they're at Yuma as we speak. That's how. Let's be real here. Yuma's not for pinewood derby experiments.
Once they announce publicly any kind of contract, the share price will rise. $1, $2, $3? I think all of these. What will be the price at the SH meeting? No clue. But, I'm willing to bet that Clark isn't willing to stand up in front of a bunch of .07 shareholders and paint a rosy future. Would you?
Best of luck.
bank
AI
