News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257250
Next 10
Followers 842
Posts 122790
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: pcrutch post# 114479

Friday, 02/11/2011 3:25:05 PM

Friday, February 11, 2011 3:25:05 PM

Post# of 257250
Musings on terms of a MNTA FoB collaboration:

…what type of partnership is $MNTA looking for in the FoB arena? It sounds like they are asking for a very big deal to encompass multiple candidates. What type of upfront payment would you anticipate for a large program like they discussed? 100-200M?

I would expect that a MNTA collaboration to develop and commercialize one or more FoB’s for the US market would have the following features:

• $40-75M of up-front cash per compound.

• A roughly 50/50 split of development costs.

• Full payment by partner of commercialization costs.

• A roughly 50/50 split of net profits.

• Indemnification by partner for potential legal liability arising from the collaboration.

• An option for ex-US development that would trigger an up-front licensing fee if exercised.

The above features might also apply to a collaboration for so-called biobetters that would be developed using the traditional BLA pathway; however, I think MNTA’s focus will be on the abbreviated regulatory pathway for FoB’s set forth in the 2010 healthcare law (#msg-48581353).

JMHO, FWIW

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Trade Smarter with Thousands

Leverage decades of market experience shared openly.

Join Now