InvestorsHub Logo

Kop

Followers 489
Posts 12377
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/20/2009

Kop

Re: ArmStock2009 post# 168560

Monday, 01/10/2011 4:02:55 PM

Monday, January 10, 2011 4:02:55 PM

Post# of 344038
I think we give them wiggle room by going in so many directions with speculation. You are on point and there is only one question to answer with multiple underlays. The donkey is getting closer to the carrot.

1. How many subscribers do we have?
a.) Of those subscribers, some are free, some are reduced, some are single, some are family. What are the associated #'s with each and total revenues associated with each target area?
b.) Of the subscribers, are the financial's prepared to indicate just paying members as the only source of revenues? Meaning are the dilution shares monies considered as assets on the financial's in a separate area than subscribers? Or at a minimum, are they on their own line item to distinguish actual gains from membership?
c. What is the break even costs associated with running the business to subscriber base in dollars?
d. The speculation of having 100,000 subscribers allowed the business to dilute over 400 million shares of stock. What subscriber base needs to be accomplished to offset that dilution on a break even scale. If 50,000 subscribers at the time of dilution wasn't enough profit margin to run operations, what is the new requirement? When the share structure was 650 million, we had 50,000 subscribers, how does the additional 80% increase in shares allow the company to create enough wealth to prevent further dilution.
e. If these numbers associated with a known 50,000 subscribers at the time of dilution, and the additional 400 million shares are accurate, what subscriber base is needed to be debt free and clear overhead costs?