InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 290
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/04/2011

Re: samsamsamiam post# 4670

Monday, 01/10/2011 11:05:05 AM

Monday, January 10, 2011 11:05:05 AM

Post# of 17882
I am sorry, but was I addressing you?

Is there a reason you are defending no dummy? I was talking about the stock and the supposed factual emails. It concerns me greatly that type of information is posted and the exact opposite was stated by the company.

And you cannot personally attack me in your post either. It is not allowed.

Okay so now you are saying the company received a Cease and Desist? Is that correct? Do you have a copy of the email too? If you do then all of the investors have a right to see that information. And how is it that you and nodummy have access to such information and the rest of us do not?

Why would I want to buy the stock back at cheaper levels only to potentially see more questionable statements that will scare more investors out of the stock. I think it is obvious what is going on here. I think my Congressman needs to be involved.

You are kidding? the exact opposite???? I think not - that press release just validated what NoDummy said - and the company was forced to address it. The company apparently did receive a cease and desist from Dayal- as pointed out by NoDummy- given they actually put it in a pr he was no longer with the company.

Anyone unable to accept the information posted by nodummy will lose big time in the end. Stop Look and Listen and invest cautiously.

lets see here - the stock is down after you sold and now you want to blame NoDummy for selling? Well buy it back at cheaper levels and thank him! If you can't sort fact from fiction you will be losing bigtime in the future.


Anything that I state is speculation and my opinion only. Please do not take anything I say as information you should invest on.