InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 23
Posts 336
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/10/2010

Re: jimmenknee post# 87424

Monday, 01/03/2011 10:39:23 PM

Monday, January 03, 2011 10:39:23 PM

Post# of 312015
There you go with your vague assertions, thereby obfuscating what in reality is a simple issue. Your clever play on words, though amusing, does not advance the discussion.

Talk about avoiding an answer:

Your post as presented juxtaposed the timeline meets my definition of lying as he offered information that contradicted a reality he knew of (or should have known of given his position). Somehow trying to resolve the present with future that really meant the present gets into a silly sort of space-time semantic parsing IMO.




Let's try this again, with the pertinent part of my prior post:


I really don't think we need to argue semantics on this one, jimmenknee, and the issue is not as complicated as you are making it. We have discussed far more complex issues in the past.

I will save you the trouble and quote myself this time.

Me:

The only mention of private placements that I recall at the AGM was someone's (Baldwin, I think) statement that the possibility of future PPs depends on the company's operations and revenue stream. I do recall him saying that if revenues were sufficient, the company would not do a PP, but I also recall him saying that he could not rule out the possibility of a future PP.



I don't see any need to pull out the "investor slang dictionary," as you put it. All you need to do is succinctly complete the following sentences:

John Bordynuik lied when he said, "__________________."

This assertion was a lie because ________________________.

Alternatively, you may complete the following sentences:

A JBI representative lied during the AGM when he said _________________. (feel free to use my paraphrase above)

This assertion was a lie because _______________________.

Sorry jimmenknee, but I suspect I'm going to get some roundabout, indirect answer from you, instead of a concrete assertion. I hope my suspicions prove incorrect, as you truly are one of my favorite "skeptics" on this board.