Plastic2Oil Inc (PTOI)

[GWMAN]

EDITED - But again, if something is happening in the present but is not public information, than the company can only do one of two things: 1) refuse to make any comment at all(which really kinda lets the cat out of the bag), or 2) talk about it as a future possibility (which is what I thought Baldwin did, no?).

I am really confused why you think the PP example from the AGM is evidence of a lie. To my knowledge, the PP was not public at the time and JB determines when something is made public. So, fact is fact: even if Baldwin knew of the PP, he simply could not have spoken about it in present tense at the AGM; and Baldwin not making public something that was still non-public in order to follow FD regs is not evidence of Baldwin lying and not evidence of JB lying. To the contrary, it seems like evidence of JB and company trying to follow the regs.

Maybe I am wrong in my understanding of material info and FD stuff, but that is how I see it.

As for your latest post:

"Why then at the AGM would he not just suggest calling the "office" if he was concerned with some discretion?"

Many people when speaking to hundreds of people do not word things perfectly or come up with the best statement on the fly.

"I also do not know the condition set-- was he responding to a question at the AGM or offering it freely as part of his presentation?"

For as much as you are discussing it, you should have a better understanding of the situation. But to answer your question, to the best of my memory from watching the video, he responded to a question on the fly.