InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 31
Posts 3557
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/28/2007

Re: Justice37 post# 83950

Tuesday, 12/21/2010 6:48:56 PM

Tuesday, December 21, 2010 6:48:56 PM

Post# of 312015
well, my impression of the Consent Order is that the DEC is bending over backwards to allow JBII to operate without having done the proper documentation, which would begin with an EA. They are allowing them to do the EA and apply for SW permit in stages with set milestones. So, it is pretty obvious that they did not do an EA.

And from my cursory perusal of the CRA web site, yes i agree that an EA is exactly the kind of thing that they would be very good at.

Islechem, on the other hand, would be where design drawings would be kept. I liken this to a nuclear plant in Canada where AECL (Atomic Energy of Canada), being the Design Authority on a CANDU reactor, would maintain a set of drawings for the core pieces of technology. OPG (Ontario Power Generation) deals directly with AECL on design issues.

None of that requires a JBII MACHINE SHOP.

Anyway..

If JBII was advised that they did not need to do an EA, they got bad advice. It is no unusual to mess these things up, just gets very expensive.

Yes, I do bring up LT planning alot. I think that in hindsight the p2O processor should have been placed on the blending site, as it would have made the permitting process easier. I don't think that JBII thought this out to well and assumed that permitting would be much easier than it has turned out to be... permitting for the first P2O processor is more like ST or Medium term planning.

the Leafs suck.

Best of the Season from the Band...