SCIENCE SPIN-OFFS

[chessmite]

not a bad idea, hope you take the lead in that direction.

since knowledge crisscrosses back and forth, I think our path will cross from time to time.

I believe that QTMM technology is like a foundational building block. If that is the case, we may find our products in any of the other links like the GCC, EU-GCC, EECA, etc. and or associated companies.

If we find something in one link, the others are also most likely competing. Seems the first to get the patents approved, get the associated benefits. The RI and of course the host country also get benefits, (jobs, economically, ability to attract other scientists, and etc.). The IO gets another step closer to connecting the links into a circle as in completing world infrastructure.

As we tend to be a basic block provider, it's all good. I believe we are on the cusp of or already in prototypes product of some kind. The problem is QDs can be in just about everything. I hope to uncover that fact by looking at some of the leading edge research,(regardless of which link).
In the process of doing that, I hope to be see the forest to get a better grasp of how our QTMM tree fits into the landscape.

That said perhaps these links will help

http://www.leitat.org/ephocell/images/stories/Ephocell_Brochure.pdf

http://www.mpbata.com/eng/projectes.php?ordre=9

looking forward to your post(s) and thoughts

regardless of the information, Hawk, Dock and others will help grind it up and we'll make as much sense out of it as we can.
thing is one person can only look at and find but so much. If I've found anything pertinent that others haven't, it proves the case in point.
I look at things a little slanted. I think we all do.
I tossed some things out there as a rough draft for a parameter. It's up to the members to help define it or work with what's there. Hawk's list fits within that parameter. The more we help,
the better our results.