Mr Cooper Group Inc (COOP)

[marayatano]

My guess is that Mary wants the GSA to be intact (hence the request of extension to parties), however, with modifications. To me it seems that Mary wants some sort of settlement and does not want this to be litigated, which in my opinion, could be doing "us" a favor (in terms of waiting on an out come from litigation, example Dimes).

I just think that being the holidays, the courts are working with a skeleton staff and there is just NOT enough time to render an Opinion without being rushed or careless.

The main thing I saw in the Order was: multiple unresolved objections, which to me is favorable to "us".

Another good thing NOL or tax implications favor "us" more in 2011.

imo

Why am I not feeling happy about this. Why is the judge even getting involved in keeping the GSA "alive"? If "those parties" wanted to keep the GSA alive, they could.

Why isn't the judge saying "I can't issue a decision before Dec 31st now {Time, conflicts, objection, whatever reasons}"... and that's it... Period.

Why have that other piece about "keep the GSA open until Jan 31st" -- I mean, maybe I'm reading too much into this... but that's not really her problem, right? (I'm inferring bad juju I know. For her to APPROVE the POR, that requires a viable GSA would definitely need to stay "open".)

Or is this just dot-eye-cross-t stuff... the "maintain status quo" as she states.... To make sure that somehow that GSA expiring isn't "blamed" on the judge for appeals, etc.

I don't know. I just didn't get warm fuzzies when I read this.