InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,469.30
(
0.39%
)
US TECH 100
19,174.00
(
1.14%
)
Dow Jones
39,112.16
(
-0.76%
)
Brent Oil
84.48
(
0.34%
)
Bitcoin
62,185.07
(
0.62%
)
Post# of 52323
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

stervc

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 5218
Posts 24047
Boards Moderated 5
Alias Born 09/20/2000

stervc

Member Level

Re: bob41 post# 13696

Monday, 12/20/2010 2:35:44 AM

Monday, December 20, 2010 2:35:44 AM

Post# of 52323
bob41...

I agree. We can only hope that companies filing NI 43-101s actually are filing real documents. When such is not the case, then we can only hope that it is brought out in time to keep investors from getting burned. These are the risks we take.

From a recent experience, this is why I think it is good to make sure that the geologist is able to be reached to verify the work for the NI 43-101 along with having some type of seal or signature on the documents.

So far, I am seeing that DGRI is a good example of how it is suppose to be.

v/r
Sterling


Sterling's Trading & Investing Strategies:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=39092516

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up