InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 55
Posts 7672
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/15/2003

Re: janice shell post# 321719

Thursday, 12/09/2010 9:08:16 PM

Thursday, December 09, 2010 9:08:16 PM

Post# of 358440
It's somewhat more helpful, but I'd be nervous about this part:

The historic data was provided in the form of paper summary drill sections (not for each hole; not including collar data). No drill hole samples/rejects or drill core was available to re-log or re-sample to verify either the assay grades or the summary geology reported. Geology was reported as overburden, rhyolite or with no reference to host lithology. The integrity and accuracy of the data available can not be verified and the resulting resource estimate and interpretation can not be guaranteed as it is based entirely on the available historic drill data where accuracy can not be confirmed. A field examination indicates the historic drill grid no longer exists and permanent drillhole collar locations are not present. As a result, the accuracy and integrity of the drill hole collar locations as reported can not be verified. Since the historic drill grid and all previous drill collar locations can not be accurately relocated and verified, the historic data may need to be re-validated with an extensive drill campaign.

Doesn't sound 43-101 compliant to me.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.