InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,541.53
(
0.59%
)
US TECH 100
19,739.20
(
0.50%
)
Dow Jones
39,211.04
(
-0.25%
)
Brent Oil
87.11
(
-0.25%
)
Bitcoin
55,393.73
(
-2.78%
)
Post# of 358440
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

CHUNKY44

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 17
Posts 1416
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/11/2003

CHUNKY44

Re: oldno70 post# 321517

Wednesday, 12/08/2010 1:33:13 AM

Wednesday, December 08, 2010 1:33:13 AM

Post# of 358440
He could have even said, "since it's a private trust fund" because he was merely agreeing with the facts as stipulated. Because if it were a private trust, it would obviously lead to a dismissal, which was the goal of the SEC's attorney.

Most likely what was said was: the SEC lawyer said IF it's a private trust fund and does not involve the SEC

Damn Right I've Got the Blues.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up