InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 61
Posts 3687
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/01/2010

Re: janice shell post# 90140

Monday, 12/06/2010 7:45:11 PM

Monday, December 06, 2010 7:45:11 PM

Post# of 111214

when it opened at 0.053 and closed at 0.059. By then the serious pump was on. It went up and up, with some selling along the way. Gee, I wonder who was doing that?



Who did this serious pump? I would like an answer to this question.

The run, fueled by one PR after another--the PRs the SEC evidently finds questionable--began to wind down on September 20, the day the stock hit 0.044



This is wrong Janice. No PR's were issued until .22 was hit and 48M shares were traded. 2 PR's were issued after .22 on the way to .44 and only 6M shares traded after the PRs. At .44 only about 7M shares traded on the way down to .13

Usually there's a PUMP and then a DUMP. These shares were bought up on no news, no promises of dividends or cash windfalls, no acquisition of monk's den.... nothing. All these shares were bought up prior to any of that.

Are you saying the DUMP happened before the PUMP? If so, that's a first.