InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 137
Posts 41656
Boards Moderated 7
Alias Born 01/05/2004

Re: warburg post# 7140

Monday, 12/06/2010 6:47:37 PM

Monday, December 06, 2010 6:47:37 PM

Post# of 17503
"Even if the program was to taper,

IT APPEARS, BASED ON THE ARTICLE, THAT THIS IS EXACTLY WHERE IT IS GOING...TAPERVILLE.


it would not effect projects that have already been applied for.

THERE IS NO POSSIBLE WAY THAT YOU CAN MAKE THAT ASSESSMENT. YOU ARE NOT IN A DECISION MAKING POSITION. A GOVERNMENT BODY CAN DO WHAT IT TAKES TO KEEP ITS ECONOMY AFLOAT. A GOVERNMENT CAN DEEM IT NOT VIABLE TO CONTINUE IT'S FIRST INITIATIVE FOR A BETTER COURSE OF ACTION.


I could see the gov't eventually reducing rates for newly applied projects, only if and after the conservatives got in, but this isn't for months. that means the race to get more fit apps in is on.

THIS IS GOVERNMENT AND MONEY TALKS..AS IN THE FORM OF LOBBYISTS, PAYOFFS, CLOSED DOOR MEETINGS AND DECISIONS, ECT.

But elimination of the whole program is out of the question. The gov't would be sued for billions if they eliminated it, which doesn't supply any jobs and doesn't make any economic sense.

THE GOVERNMENT CAN BE HELD HARMLESS AND WITHOUT MALICE.

WHO WOULD SUE THE GOVERNMENT IN THEIR RIGHT MIND ? THAT IS A SUREFIRE TICKET TO NEVER GETTING ANY FUTURE GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS IN THE FUTURE.

ADDITIONALLY THEY, THE GOVERNMENT, CAN AT WILL ELIMINATE ANY PROJECTS/PROGRAMS SITING AFTER OTHER INFORMATION WAS COLLECTED AND DISCERNED THAT PROJECTS/PROGRAMS NEED TO BE SCALED BACK CONSIDERABLY (which is legal terms for eventually eliminated entirely)


This is all political hype to get votes. IMHO. "

invest at your own risk, based on your own due diligence, at your own risk tolerance