InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 15
Posts 1652
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/01/2009

Re: just_an_ant post# 153211

Sunday, 11/28/2010 3:56:13 PM

Sunday, November 28, 2010 3:56:13 PM

Post# of 241038
You got me Ant, calling a poster out for claiming $1 is definitely what I was referring to...And calling this a speculative investment every so often is something I would like to commend you on as well...but by your posting style/nature...would a newbie really call this very speculative? Being that you call it speculative, I would expect you to embrace more intelligent debates on the pitfalls, trials, and tribulations of a start up company and it's initiatives..."speculative" does mean "questionable" or "theoretical" doesn't it....all three words leave room for more discussion....not as cut in dry as your posts make it seem...but yet every time an "objection" to a positive related post or initiative arises...can you explain why the poster and post is attacked by 10 different posters even if the post was accurate? I know why...it's because the board is in need for a change here...which Is why I am glad I am a Moderator (Thank you Tib), as this board has for to long been in control of positive-sediment-only posters...

Of course I'm slanted towards pointing out potential - I'm invested and interested in if others are seeing similar potential.


Please re-read the this link...http://ihwiki.advfn.com/index.php?title=Handbook#About_Message_Boards_and_the_Moderators.27_Role

Board Moderators are entitled and encouraged to express their investment sentiment in the same manner as any other Member; by participating in the dialog. However; insofar as their Moderator privileges are concerned, it is not the Moderators’ role to promote bullish or bearish sentiment, to guide the "tone" of the content along any particular investment sentiment, or to favor one investment sentiment over another.



So you see...preferring/"slanting" towards one side is against the rules...as a moderator...