InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 13
Posts 1364
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/03/2009

Re: A deleted message

Thursday, 11/25/2010 11:12:23 PM

Thursday, November 25, 2010 11:12:23 PM

Post# of 45174
answer me this why would they rs this stock after stating 2 to 3 times that there will no rs? I'm not saying it wont happen but what would be the point to saying no rs in the first place when they intended to do it? Stating no rs did zero for the ps.... Would they do it before or after the buy stock back? would they rs themselves? would they buy back after the rs and pay up? or rs it drive it down again and then buy it back? none of it makes any sense ...... the only thing at the moment that makes sense to me is drive it down dilute it and the buy back with the profits from dilution... I don't like it one bit but is makes $ sense.... at least in this situation....
my mind is wide open so explain way.....