not only that but the subs of wmi that were rolled into jpm and chase, that were never shown, because they were the holding company's property not wamus, will also bring us into the money. this show is just getting warmed up. rosen's losing the nol argument because any return comes back to the estate period. the 4 bil deposit is being held outside the estate.fdic is "claiming it" because the simple fact is if it is returned in "plain sight", the fdic goes down just like in the savings and loans scandals they orchestrated during feingold/mccain era. they had to return them because of corruption there too. the irs refunds are in another account.they are compartmentalizing these monies to keep the "huge bundle" out of sight of the commoners that cant add, and the american taxpayers that are going to end up footing their bill. if this case were nothing it would have been over the first 6 months. if this case were nothing we wouldnt have seen the violent manipulation of the stock in the last 2.5 yrs. and congress certainly wouldnt have changed legislation to cover their asses for future takedowns unless this case is the "mammoth case" i feel it is. yes geithner....there will never be another wamu. but the wamu thats here must be compensated for their losses and shareholders must be made whole again. the only case that is in court is wamu the bank and rosen is bringing the holding company into the fold, like he's taking that too. well if he takes it he must pay for it...do i hear 115 to 160 a share for the whole ball of wax to get rid of this case once and for all? could be since the fdic will eat this case because of illegal seizure of a holding company and scrubbing the 3.1a on the first day. they were caught immediately and they knew it. this whole case has been a smoke screen from the beginning and jpm is squatting in wamu's banks, foreclosing on homeowners that they have no right to. they have to settle, to obtain ownership of the mortgages they "assumed" from wamu. isnt that why deutsche bank is suing them right now because of fraudulent conveyance? jmo.
