InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 161
Posts 5310
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/24/2009

Re: None

Wednesday, 11/24/2010 12:05:16 PM

Wednesday, November 24, 2010 12:05:16 PM

Post# of 734084
Transcript of the Tricadia ruling -- with original input from Nightdaytrader9 (gb)
_______________
Unofficial Transcription, removing the human "uhs..."  and inserting a few -- conceptual words of mine in {xx}
_______________

THJMW:
"Well, let me say this, I am going to grant the motion, for a couple of reasons:  

Number one, it is not unusual, that a Debtor would request this in order to preserve, possible benefits such as an NOL,

Secondly, I think that to the extent the debtor is correct in their claim that, imminently confirmable and will be confirmed in a week, the imposition on the creditors who are the ones being imposed upon will be di minimus,

It will simply, effect a restriction on trading for a very short period of time, and against the possibility, that additional NOL usage may be realized.

{however}

If the plan is not confirmed {or} then it is modified by agreement, I think is certainly worth the cost.."
_______________________________

IMHO -- she's staying neutral, even if she has an opinion -- giving both options -- and not tipping her hand -- "to the extent the debtor is correct in their claim"


...Catz



.


.... Please, just call me Catz ;) - - - - - {and the requisite, all IMHO, do your own due diligence, and make your own investments}

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News