Plastic2Oil Inc (PTOI)

[Johnik]

That is an interesting question. In Kaplanis's complaint (paragraph 13), he alleged:

"13. The Agreement provided MICHAEL KAPLANIS with a base salary of $120,000 and initial "Incentive Stock Options" of 100,000 shares, which MICHAEL KAPLANIS received as stock upon signing the Agreement." (emphasis added)

Yet, in his opposition filed today, he (or his counsel) states (on page 8):

"[B]ecause the Plaintiff did not receive the promised [100K shares of] stock from Mr. Bordynuik, Mr. Bordynuik's representations regarding the same constitute fraud or another tortious act . . . ."

I'm having trouble reconciling these two statements. Anyone else notice this?