InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,460.48
(
-0.41%
)
US TECH 100
19,181.60
(
-0.43%
)
Dow Jones
39,118.86
(
-0.12%
)
Brent Oil
84.85
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
60,916.27
(
1.00%
)
Post# of 60937
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

Sheepdog

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 104
Posts 43470
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 02/13/2010

Sheepdog

Member Level

Re: sixpack post# 39179

Monday, 11/15/2010 1:14:10 PM

Monday, November 15, 2010 1:14:10 PM

Post# of 60937
Daic is alleging default of the 2008 settlement agreement. The default term of that agreement is that the company owes him approx $150M on the original Judgement. If we are in default and if we cannot pay the $150M, then he says we must turn over our assets, which are the patents, for the court to sell to raise funds for payment.

All of this is proper IF we are in default. We are not....

I have no humble opinions, but I do have opinions and those are what I express in my posts. BUT...I have been wrong before and likely will be wrong again so do your own research and don't blame me if you are too lazy to do so.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up