InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 176
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/02/2003

Re: Clarence post# 97190

Monday, 03/07/2005 4:08:54 PM

Monday, March 07, 2005 4:08:54 PM

Post# of 432681
Clarence

So then we come back to (Why did Nokia sign the contract in the first place?)
I believe Nokia stated because they didn't believe they would ever have to pay IDCC.

So who is treating who unfairly here?

Seems to me Nokia is P Oed because IDCC may have snookered them at their own game.

IDCC must have figured out that Nokia had no intention of paying them in the future so here we are.

Anybody feel sorry for Nokia?

I don't

Moose

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News