InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 960
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/09/2006

Re: steelheader7 post# 250279

Friday, 11/05/2010 11:26:07 AM

Friday, November 05, 2010 11:26:07 AM

Post# of 730273
Steel -- This seems to be against what JMW was looking for from examiner. Without going back to get exact quotes, I thought that since there were so many roadblocks to discovery being completed, she decided to appoint examiner and demand that everyone give him what was needed. Using that train of thought, wouldn't it be safe to assume that JMW is not expecting this case to go back to basically square one (fuller version of the debate)? I think she expected to look at report and see if equity was/could be in the money. If so, make a settlement. If not, approve POR. So the question begs, where does JMW think this report leaves us? I am now of the opinion that law doesn't even matter in this case anymore. No prediction of what will happen, but whatever it is, it will be because JMW has had enough. Either she will say there is no proof equity is in money so stop trying or she will say that she has not gotten cooperation, so get something done very soon.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News