InvestorsHub Logo

sf

Followers 33
Posts 1283
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/25/2008

sf

Re: tpg post# 248205

Tuesday, 11/02/2010 5:08:50 PM

Tuesday, November 02, 2010 5:08:50 PM

Post# of 730152
absolutely right. the "public" has one copy with scathing footnotes. and all i had to see was that we were solvent.that is all that matters. the judge has the real copy of the unredacted numbers and inquiries imo. they have to paint it rosey for jpm and fdic because geithners days are numbered and JD is the only power hungry one for the job. also they have to cover themselves from future lawsuits too. i feel susman allowed this out today for the press opportunity so jpm could get out the "word". (cover shorts!) now its our turn and susman will see this to fruition. this examiners report was no report at all. with the minimal info why put anything out at all? unless it needed to be done when all eyes seem to be on other things like the ELECTION! this was so apparent. have we not been saying this thing was going to dip on a holiday or event when they could get the smear campaign out to "clear" themselves? the smoking gun is still smoking imo. it's still in the shareholders back! our turn is coming and we will be paid...but quietly...no asset lists,no liability, no fault, just cash in our accounts with no appology. and i still feel the 364 billion number they said taxpayers were going to be out for fre and fnm is actually the payout to "consume" wmb and wmi entirely. all my opinion but i truly believe the truth will prevail.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News