Monday, November 01, 2010 1:55:54 AM
The real question is why they claimed that all previous negative issues had been resolved when this PR shows that they clearly were not.
And comma or not, I believe that the settlement is for $25,000 plus expenses, not for the whole 4 million. Just a mistake in the PR, IMO.
But why in the world would they need to break down $25,000 into payments?! If there were any Chinese consortium with big bucks backing this, they would clear it immediately- heck, maybe they need me to make them a loan. LOL Very telling.
North Bay Resources Announces Mt. Vernon Gold Mine Startup, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Aug 5, 2024 9:00 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc. and All-In-Extracts Announce Joint Venture to Develop and Release New Testosterone Boosting Supplement • BLEG • Aug 5, 2024 8:30 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Announces Strategic Initiatives and Corporate Direction Changes • KGKG • Aug 2, 2024 2:00 PM
POET and Luxshare Tech Expand Product Offerings for Artificial Intelligence Networks • POET • Aug 1, 2024 9:28 AM
Management Discusses Financial Filings of Global Arena Holding Inc., for 10-K 2023 and 10-Q, 1st Quarter 2024 • GAHC • Aug 1, 2024 9:14 AM
VAYK Announces LOI to Acquire $1 Million Home Service Company to Support Airbnb Business • VAYK • Aug 1, 2024 9:00 AM