InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 24
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/31/2010

Re: NukeJohn post# 297248

Sunday, 10/31/2010 4:33:14 PM

Sunday, October 31, 2010 4:33:14 PM

Post# of 432924
NukeJohn
let me challenge a few of your assumptions on Samsung

Before IDCC settled with Samsung in early '09, IDCC already had a bond to collect from Samsung following 2G arbitration amounting to almost $200m covering the period 2002-2005. So if they can get that much money from 2G, covering 4 years (which backs out at over $1/unit) why oh why would they settle a 10yr licensing deal (2002-2012) for just $400m? Something smells. if you back out Samsung's 2G shipments from 2002-2012 - its well over 1bn units. So was 3G given away free?

So I'd appreciate your thoughts on why you think $300m of the $400m settlement with Samsung related to 3G. On my numbers, the 3G part came for free.



Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News