InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[my3sons87]

Why should Nokia be allowed to have access to rulings that essentially became MOOT upon settlement by the parties. Isn't that very much like saying to the court that we no longer want this litigated. And what has been litigated to date should remain a secret between the parties and the court.

Furthermore, why should Nokia be allowed to further their finances and intrests using litigation that was paid for by Ericy and IDCC.

I really think Judge Lynn took the wind out of Nokia's sails when she made the documents available to the arb panel if they so desired the documents.

It seems really weird that 2 parties can spend millions of dollars in litigation costs, and then settle the matter and a 3rd party comes along asking for the entire case file.