InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 1404
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/07/2007

Re: None

Wednesday, 10/13/2010 7:01:00 PM

Wednesday, October 13, 2010 7:01:00 PM

Post# of 159752
The comments these days seem to lack ALOT of common sense. Any deals made closing out shareholder positions would be a violation of federal law or simply viewed as insider trading. The removal of shares from the outstanding or float effects the market price and demand there of. That applies to Megas as well. All would be done requiring legal representation and recorded with SEC over sight. This stock is locked up tight. You would need to protect yourself even if you settled with your broker from an SEC investigation and charges of federal security law violations. First posters say you can't force a "short squeeze" and now they want to say we can do away with "all demand" behind back door deals. I'm laughing my a$$ off trying to listen to all the BS.

Maybe we should be wondering what Megas might be doing in PNG with what goal as an end result? If the DTC has no intention of letting this trade that would require a settlement or the SEC being forced to do their job to get this resolved. Can we really even start to trade as it stands and would we really want to? The SEC has already shown they have no intention of getting this legally covered. Something has to happen that forces their hand or shows it. We either settle or Megas does some form of payout that makes the legal battle completely one sided. Does everyone think Megas has been on Bougainville Island for over a year and hasn't made one dime to justify his time? Whats gold an ounce now? $1375.00

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.