InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 48
Posts 5505
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 10/21/2009

Re: jesss post# 34550

Sunday, 10/03/2010 6:40:27 PM

Sunday, October 03, 2010 6:40:27 PM

Post# of 54875
Jesss, yes, yes, and yes! It would be good, never said it was bad on the fundamentals here.

I majored in accounting, finance, and business management. I know exactly what would happen and it would definitely look a lot better from a new investor POV looking at MOPN for the first time.

Herein lies the problem: a lot of reverse splits I've tracked this year alone: ANX, BNVI for starters, went down a lot more than if they had not done a reverse split. Psychologically when I see my 100k shares turn into 10000 or whatever fraction less, I feel like I've lost something when in fact I have not lost anything as the proportions are the same: less shares higher price.

Many people doing due diligence want to know why the company has reverse split its stock, and if there is a history of doing so, as many stocks do it for nefarious reasons; ie: reverse split, dilute, dilute, reverse split again.

These are my thoughts on this matter, but they surely don't deny your claims to making MOPN, as an investment, more attractive.