InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[sinnet14]

Corp_buyer, while I did agree with you about the over-compensation of IDCC management during past years, I think your following concerns are overstated:

Nok cited this clause to the Court and Nok thinks it is important to them. This seems to be the key clause that Nok is using to base their arguments about patent strength, Nok's lack of use of IDCC's technology, IDCC/E collusion to structure their settlement in the form of sham licenses, etc..

from the following:
Nokia originally made claims in the Nokia arbitration requesting that the arbitration panel make specific findings of invalidity and/or non-infringement of ITC patents (some of which were involved in the Ericsson litigation). Nokia subsequently withdrew such claims.

we know that Nokia is not challenging patent invalidity and non-infringement. Therefore, the "all relevant factors" should not be about patent strength(invalidity) lack of use of IDCC's technology(non-infringement).