InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 68
Posts 1204
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/02/2003

Re: laranger post# 95523

Thursday, 02/17/2005 7:31:02 PM

Thursday, February 17, 2005 7:31:02 PM

Post# of 433025
laranger, I would love to see NOK go down that path...

If they suddenly want to argue that the written contractual wording should be discarded and replaced with their intended meaning (i.e., that a company can only be a trigger if it exceeds a certain market share at the time of licensing) it would only work to our advantage.

It might serve NOK's purpose for 2G, but it would mean that the existing 3G license with NEC would take on new significance. After all, NEC has a very substantial market share for 3G handsets right now. We could argue that NEC was a market leader in 3G when they signed their license, and as such should trigger NOK's 3G royalty obligations at the rate they are paying.

i_q

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News