Mr Cooper Group Inc (COOP)

[argc]

It's amazing people make a conclustion base on something he claim to hear but refuse to even do a futhur research.
This might be the script he is referring to .
"Arthur Steinberg: With respect to Mr. Rosen’s last comment a confirmation hearing of December assumes that approval of the disclosure statement before the examiner has actually written a report about the substance of the global settlement and we reserve the right to make the argument that the next hearing date on the disclosure statement that the disclosure statement should not be disseminated until the examiners report has been issued and that the contents of the report and its significance as to the plan is fully disclosed in one document. I think people talked about trying to do this as a parallel track and cited the Tribune case as an example of the benefits of doing a parallel track well after the disclosure statement was out and money was spent to circulate the plan of disclosure statement the examiners report came about and based on the examiners report the fundamentals of the plan had radically changed to the point that the debtor withdrew the disclosure statement and I just think in the context of this case with so many people who have commented on the discloser statement that I think that there are probably 600 filed objections at various points in time that we want to reserve the right to be able to ask your honor not to disseminate the disclosure statement until the examiner has fully commented on the global settlement.

Rosen: Your honor Mr. Steinberg started out {??? 36:18} September 24th and we will be happy to address that at that time.

Judge: Alright I will address it on the 24th,

I don't see Judge say she will rule on DS on the 24th, she will address Arthur Steinberg's issue that `:With respect to Mr. Rosen’s last comment a confirmation hearing of December assumes that approval of the disclosure statement before the examiner has actually written a report about the substance of the global settlement and we reserve the right to make the argument that the next hearing date on the disclosure statement that the disclosure statement should not be disseminated until the examiners report has been issued`

Can we put this to a restÉ