I've been following this madness (from a safe distance) for years just because I find it so entertaining. But this is a head scratcher for me... The complainants appear to have been selected by the attorney and don't seem to have the first clue what their attorney is doing. I haven't seen any hint of even the most nebulous of documentary evidence supporting the claims in the complaint.
So here's what I'll never understand...if the complainants have no direct knowledge that would affirm the assertions in the complaint and the attorney has no documentary evidence to present to the court what are the next few words to be uttered by Attorney Hodges after opening arguments? Assuming this actually goes to trial he's gonna have to call a witness or present some evidence. No?
Sorry if this is all too obvious but I just don't get it.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.