CMKM Diamonds Inc (fka CMKX)

[Tavycal]

JM I beleive he is talking about Nevada Minerals. I could be wrong though.


Home > Investments > Penny Stocks > CMKX

Latest [ Topics / Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 3692 of 4278
Post > Topic >>
CMKX
by "stockseekerok" <aholt532003@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 24, 2004 at 06:48 PM


Alvin" <hal53@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Date: Thu Jun 24, 2004 4:32 pm
Subject: CMKX AND UCAD


ADVERTISEMENT


By: stockseekerok
24 Jun 2004, 04:39 PM EDT
Msg. 38723 of 38746
Jump to msg. #
By: stockseekerok
10 May 2004, 01:02 PM EDT
Msg. 221326 of 255188
Jump to msg. #
i found that a group called BBX equity funded Barrington foods in
2003
barrington foods is now UCAD
BBX is located in Las Vegas

ucad became a mining comp shortly before we started drilling
ucad joined cmkx in canadian deal
ucad is co-sposor of funny car
ucad had links to funny car on their website
ucad is also offering cmkx memorabilia
ucad is agressively finding new minig companies for purchase
BBX funding must still be in place
Rick Walker, company president of Shane Resources (SEI.H) CDNX,
Consolidated Pine Channel (KPG) CDNX, and United Carina Resources
(UCA) CDNX, to share the cost on this major airborne survey.
Makes them actually 50 % owners in claims
if what i think is right cmkx still owns 50% of everything
i think we own big portion of ucad or all of it, makes for 50 %
see the team could only be a 2 part instead of 4
Because we own Ucad

Just some thoughts do your DD to check this theory

SSok

http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/cmkxtrememachine/

Check out the above link for more exciting stuff on cmkx

Barrington foods was broke in december 2004 , and now all of a
sudden they ars a mining company with lts of money to spend

UCAD AND CMKX TIES

Read this Ucad Statement and you will see the early developmental
stages of the CMKX AND UCAD LINK. We own UCAD

Form 10QSB for U S CANADIAN MINERALS INC


---------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------

21-May-2004

Quarterly Report


Item 2. PLAN OF OPERATION.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS


This Form 10-QSB includes "forward-looking statements" within the
meaning ofSection 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and
Section 21E of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All
statements, other thanstatements of historical facts, included or
incorporated by reference in thisForm 10-QSB which address
activities, events or developments which the Companyexpects or
anticipates will or may occur in the future, including such things
as future capital expenditures (including the amount and nature
thereof), finding suitable merger or acquisition candidates,
expansion and growth of the Company's business and operations, and
other such matters are forward-looking statements. These statements
are based on certain assumptions and analyses made by the Company in
light of its experience and its perception of historical trends,
current conditions and expected future developments as well as other
factors it believes are appropriate inthe circumstances. However,
whether actual results or developments will conform with the
Company's expectations and predictions is subject to a number of
risks and uncertainties, general economic market and business
conditions; the business opportunities (or lack thereof) that may be
presented to and pursued by the Company; changes in laws or
regulation; and other factors, most of which are beyond the control
of the Company.

This Form 10-QSB contains statements that constitute "forward-
lookingstatements." These forward-looking statements can be
identified by the use ofpredictive, future tense or forward-looking
terminology, such
as "believes,""anticipates," "expects," "estimates," "plans," "may,"
"will," or similarterms. These statements appear in a number of
places in this Registrationand include statements regarding the
intent, belief or current expectationsof the Company, its directors
or its officers with respect to, among other things: (i) trends
affecting the Company's financial condition or results of operations
for its limited history; (ii) the Company's business and
growthstrategies; and, (iii) the Company's financing plans.
Investors are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are
not guarantees of future performance and involve significant risks
and uncertainties, and that actual results may differ materially
from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result
of various factors. Factors that could adversely affect actual
results and performance include, among others, the Company's limited
operating history, potential fluctuations inquarterly operating
results and expenses, government regulation, technologicalchange and
competition.


Consequently, all of the forward-looking statements made in this
Form 10-QSBare qualified by these cautionary statements and there
can be no assurance that the actual results or developments
anticipated by the Company will be realized or, even if
substantially realized, that they will have the expectedconsequence
to or effects on the Company or its business or operations.
TheCompany assumes no obligations to update any such forward-looking
statements.


PLAN OF OPERATION
-

((((On January 2, 2004, the Company changed its name from Barrington
FoodsInternational, Inc. to U.S. Canadian Minerals, Inc.))))

This marked a material,significant and fundamental change in the
Company's business, and future plans.The Company abandoned the
business plan it tried to implement since 2001, thatfocused on
marketing and selling a variety of soy based food products and
otherconsumer goods to developing nations.

(((In its place, the Company decided topursue the mining development
business, focusing on (1) acquiring rights to landwhere precious and
semi precious minerals and rocks were believed to exist;acquiring
the necessary equipment and know how to operate the mines;
and,selling the ore for profit; and, (2) expanding its mining
business into othermining related ventures that included acquiring
and operating existing smeltingand milling operations. )))

Each of the ventures discussed below must be read in conjunction
with thefollowing section regarding risk factors associated with
mining for preciousminerals and gemstones.


COMMON RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH MINING FOR PRECIOUS MINERALS AND GEM
STONES


(((Generally speaking, there are a number of basic geological tests
that must besuccessfully completed by a developer in order to
justify full-scale miningoperations for precious minerals and
gemstones at any site. Typically,
((aerialmagnetic surveys ))
are first conducted over a particular tract of land. Thesesurveys
provide imaging based upon the magnetic qualities of gold and
diamondsthat can be detected through the magnetic technology in any
given cubic meter ofraw land.
(( Assuming that the magnetic aerial examination reveals the
presence ofgold, diamonds, or other precious minerals, the next step
is to perform augerdrilling at the site.)
(( HOW DID A FOOD COMPANY NO THIS))

(( This involves drilling small core samples, approximately1-2
inches in diameter, and analyzing them for the existence of trace
mineralsat various depths. Once the core samples are examined and
evaluated, andassuming that the core samples reveal amounts of
precious metals, mineralsand/or diamonds, then bulk sampling occurs
in those areas shown by augerdrilling to have the most potential.))

The land is divided into "grids." Bulksampling involves using
backhoes and excavating up to 100 meters of raw dirtfrom promising
grids for mill processing. Processing at the mill will result ina
statistical analysis of approximately how many karats of diamonds,
gold, orother precious minerals and gemstones may exist in each
grid.


Once these steps are complete, then the developer of the area
retains anindependent expert geologist to review the developer's
work and research.Typically, the independent geologist will perform
some of the same testsdescribed above. If the expert's results are
consistent with that of thedeveloper, then the expert verifies the
tract (also referred to as being "provedup") and the resources on
the land, then the developer proceeds to more largescale on site
mining operations.

Undertaking the preliminary testing on any given tract of land is
costly.

(((Thepreliminary testing described above requires retaining persons
who possessexperience and sophisticated technology, such as with the
aerial magneticsurveys.))

((Additionally, there are substantial costs involved with
hiringexperienced persons to perform and analyze the auger drilling
and bulk sampling.Further, hiring an independent expert to verify or
prove up the resources can beboth time consuming and costly.))

Aside from costs related to the professionalexpertise of persons
necessary to perform these services, it should be notedthat these
services may have to be provided outside of the United States.
Asdiscussed below, there are at least two development interests the
Company ispursuing in Canada and Brazil.

((There is no guarantee that the Company will beable to finance such
testing on tracts where there has been no testing to date,such as
the fort a la Corne, Prince Albert, Province of Saskatchewan,
Canadaproperty discussed below.))
I SMELL URBAN IS ABOUT

(( Further, there is a substantial risk that even wherethe Company
might be able to arrange for adequate financing to carry
onpreliminary testing, that there may not be evidence of sufficient
amounts ofprecious metals, gemstones and/or minerals that would make
it reasonable toproceed with full scale mining operations, resulting
in the foreseeablepossibility that the Company could incur large
losses on unsuccessfuldevelopments and related projects.))

((Presently, the Company does not have sufficient funds to implement
the businessplan it adopted and as described herein. The Company
expects that it will needto acquire debt and equity financing in
order to sustain operations over thenext twelve month period.))

DO YOU SEE URBAN YET

There is no guarantee that the Company will acquiresuch financing,
and so readers are warned to take this into account whenevaluating
this issuer.

The Company's accountant has included the following statement in its
notes tothis filing:

"The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going
concernbasis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the
satisfaction ofliabilities in the normal course of business. ((The
Company has incurredcumulative net losses of approximately
$18,345,000 since its inception andrequires capital for its
contemplated operational activities to take place.)))

SEE THEY ARE BROKE

Thecompany's ability to raise additional capital through the future
issuances ofthe common stock is unknown. The obtainment of
additional financing, thesuccessful development of the Company's
contemplated plan of operations, and itstransition, ultimately, to
the attainment of profitable operations are necessaryfor the Company
to continue operations. The ability to successfully resolvethese
factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue asa going concern. The consolidated financial statements of
the Company do notinclude any adjustments that may result from the
outcome of these aforementioneduncertainties."



THE JOINT VENTURE WITH NEVADA MINERALS, INC./SASKATCHEWAN PROPERTY


((On January 20, 2004, the Company entered into a formal joint
venture agreementwith Nevada Minerals, Inc. to develop up to 500,000
acres of potentialKimberlite Mineral property located on the east
and northwest sides of fort a laCorne, Prince Albert, Province of
Saskatchewan, Canada.))


Kimberlite andKimberlite pipes are the raw materials from which
diamonds may be extracted. Thejoint venture operates under the
name "NevCan." The joint venture has a termthat expires on January
20, 2005. By the terms of the joint venture contract,the Company has
the rights to twenty percent of the revenues from miningoperations
at the site. As consideration for entering into the joint
venture,the Company paid to Nevada Minerals, Inc. five million
shares of restrictedcommon stock. For its part, Nevada Minerals,
Inc. tendered its rights to developthe 500,000 acres at the fort a
la Corne, Prince Albert site. No on site miningdevelopment of this
property presently exists and no preliminary testing hasoccurred.
All prospective mining operations on this land are contingent on
anumber of preliminary tests being successfully completed, as
discussed above.