InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 9
Posts 2033
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/26/2010

Re: 1967_sojourner post# 55771

Saturday, 08/28/2010 12:48:07 PM

Saturday, August 28, 2010 12:48:07 PM

Post# of 345969
Typ tried to facillatate what you were just asking last year or the prior year and was roundly ridiculed by the pro mgmt posters on this board. I also agree that the proxy statement is a positive for a shareholder to build some legal action.

How does mgmt have the nerve to call this BOD independent when they are all or were members of the same BOD of other comapanies that ES runs? How are shareholders more better off with this independence? Who gives them the right once again to decide for the majority of shareholders if we need a COB or not?

Are the shareholders better off that PPHM had to go to court with Epstein? How did that pan out?

Are the shareholders better off because of the China subsidiary that was set up? Where is the update?

Are the shareholders better off because we have a board made up of off shore financiers with great savvy business? LOL!! Where is the progress of we are in talks for the last seven years?

Yes this board has really served shareholders to date all the while receiving an outrageous compensation package for what they have delivered. The only thing significant they have delivered is a lower stock price.

The sad part is that the only valid responses you get is that you should sell if you don't like it. Real intelligent.

All imo.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CDMO News