InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 467
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/28/2010

Re: wamuvoodoo post# 229785

Sunday, 08/15/2010 1:08:35 PM

Sunday, August 15, 2010 1:08:35 PM

Post# of 738265
I am not well familiarized with the entire situation,but I would like to discuss the possible political consequences of a large magnitude ruling in favor of equity. To misprice a bank and its assets amidst financial chaos is one thing, but to be a co conspirator to bring down and negotiate a bargain in favor of another financial institution namely JP Morgan is a different story. A positive ruling can have a domino effect in the public perception of it's federal agencies. I think that these factors will be evaluated to determine whether to give back to the shareholders or not to give back anything and continue with the lie in the name of preservation of the larger scheme of things status quo. Anybody has thought about this? Now, if ruled in favor what would be An acceptable number to stockholders to reach a settlement? What could the pps be if a fair game is played which is unlikely but hypothetically speaking and in sake of an intelligent debate
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News