Mr Cooper Group Inc (COOP)

[steel58]

VOODOO -- My question sort of expands on yours. I don't know that the examiner can do a half-a** job. Let's say he only finds a portion of the assets. Let's also say Solomon provides numbers that double what examiner finds to that point. Is it then examiners duty to use the numbers, or at least make Solomon prove them before he uses them, or can he just ignore them?

That would bring you question into play.

If his whole thing is to get the evidence and someone provides it to him, I would assume he has to follow-up even if that means asking for more time if needed.

Now, what is Weil, etc allowed to argue? Can they say that Solomon's numbers are wrong? With the fact that they still haven't produced a list, can they say something like, JPM didn't get that asset, we don't know where it is? Or does the examiner have to find it all, then let them argue it out after his report is filed?

Now I see why the pps is not skyrocketing. Nobody has any idea of all the twists and turn this can still take. Many people mention September 7 as our do or die. That is a scary thought, but it would seem that after all that has happened in this case, that arguments will be occurring long after that.