Tuesday, February 01, 2005 4:57:04 PM
Had HTDS prevailed in their motion, the case would have been over with as far as the ownership issue and the only thing left to try, I suppose since I haven't seen the pleadings, is damages caused by the acts of the other party. It would have been nice to just have to go over and try the damages issue knowing that you've already won what you really wanted, which is the rights to Tubercin.
Sometimes summary judgments pass the test, and sometimes they don't. I really haven't kept up with this case but as I recall skimming through the order it seemed the court had a question as to whether or not the deal was ever consumated and it appears that this is the fact issue that he denied the motion under.
JJ
FEATURED Element79 Gold Corp. Reports Significant Progress in Community Relations and Development Efforts in Chachas, Peru • Oct 9, 2024 10:30 AM
Unitronix Corp Launches Share Buyback Initiative • UTRX • Oct 9, 2024 9:10 AM
BASANITE INDUSTRIES, LLC RECEIVES U.S. PATENT FOR ITS BASAFLEX™ BASALT FIBER COMPOSITE REBAR AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING • BASA • Oct 9, 2024 7:30 AM
BNCM COMPLETES MERGER WITH DELEX HEALTHCARE • BNCM • Oct 8, 2024 9:54 AM
CBD Life Sciences, Inc. (CBDL) Reaches Unprecedented Heights With Explosive Growth and Strategic Expansion in 2024 • CBDL • Oct 8, 2024 8:00 AM
Unitronix Corp. to Invest $3 Million in USA Unity Coin Project • UTRX • Oct 7, 2024 7:08 AM