InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 41
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/09/2009

Re: breezin_chs post# 37262

Thursday, 07/29/2010 9:51:30 PM

Thursday, July 29, 2010 9:51:30 PM

Post# of 46585
Still in denial I see. The very fact that in Canada the person who is claimed to have committed defamation must prove their innocence rather than the plaintiff having to prove defamation is sufficient grounds for non-enforcement. Plus, the Canadian Supreme Court has specifically ruled that the US Constitution does not apply to Canadian findings of law.

You may have missed this provision. Their lawsuit against message boards dead on arrival.

(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provision of
Federal or State law, a domestic court shall not recognize
or enforce a foreign judgment for defamation against the provider
of an interactive computer service, as defined in section
230 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 230) unless
the domestic court determines that the judgment would be
consistent with section 230 if the information that is the subject
of such judgment had been provided in the United States.


They have made such fanfare of their lawsuits and threats of lawsuits. Why do you think have they not attempted to bring any of the actions to the USA? The answer is obvious: it would put an end to their terroristic bluster.