InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 56
Posts 967
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/13/2009

Re: wamuvoodoo post# 223188

Tuesday, 07/20/2010 9:54:40 AM

Tuesday, July 20, 2010 9:54:40 AM

Post# of 730485
Indeed. Did anyone ever expect them to publicly reveal to the court that they screwed up, breached their fiduciary duty to the estate and engaged in fraudulent activity (or helped JPM cover up their activity)?

They're trying to make themselves appear to be in support of the examiner and an investigation to maximize the value of the estate - because they would surely look suspicious if they didn't - but at the same time they're trying to raising doubts as to the effect the examiner would have on the estate if nothing is found and hoping the judge will allow them to continue with the DS/POR.

I can't wait to hear Susman/Nelson and hope the judge tells Rosen to take his DS/POR back to hell and appoints an examiner with a broad scope of examination. Lets see what happens.

MAKINGMOVES

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News