For: Brian Rosen.
Man we sure due have a lot of speculation flying around here on Yahoo land, but if you think about it for a second, how can a reasonable person justify giving away billions of NOL’s, claims against JPM, FDIC, OTS and credit rating agencies involved in the take down of a 300 billion corporation.
How can you justify this with your current POR/DS?
Simple answer is you can’t. Listen up BR, you throwing crap at the wall hoping something will stick. Dude it’s not going to happen.
JPM received 25B in TARP funds and by Law JPM can not receive NOL’s. You are a Lawyer right? I think you need to retake the Bar exam so you can familiar yourself with current Law.
Why would you give NOL’s to the FDIC for seizing a solvent bank when it cost tax payers zero, nothing/nada? OTS and JPM admitted in court documents that WAMU was a solvent bank at the time of seizure!!! Again retake the Bar exam so you can familiar yourself with current Law when giving NOL’s to FDIC.
Well the bottom line up front to your failure is the greed of the BOD, JPM, FDIC and your Law firm for milking the assets of WAMU. How dare you sir in open court to state that the EC is trying to milk JPM when you are supposed to represent WAMU. Who owns WAMU?
A. Bondholders
B. Creditors
C. Shareholders
You and your team are against a brick wall and a sealed document in which two hours passed in the Judge Chambers. I bet Susman team of lawyers looked under the rug and found some dirt. They opened up a closet and guess what? Found a skeleton!
Bottom line up front is pay up!!!!!
