With ~50% institutional ownership, Harvey will have no choice whatsoever. I believe Berger put all those new take-over clauses in his employement agreement as well as others because he knows institutions would have full vote / control with the institutional ownership where it is. It's a lot more important (control) with big institutional sponsorship at 50% than it was at 20% (when no one cared about ARIAD)
Shareholders, I can almost guarantee you would vote in favor of a $15 bid, even if it is hostile. Poison pill won't matter one bit because shareholders would vote FOR the price. (assuming a poison pill even exists)
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.