InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 56
Posts 967
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/13/2009

Re: chaarles post# 220357

Monday, 07/12/2010 3:21:53 PM

Monday, July 12, 2010 3:21:53 PM

Post# of 736058
I don't think it was documentation filed with the intention of further supporting the already certain and imminent appointment of an examiner - I simply said whatever evidence he brought would add further support to the already solid case for his/her appointment. As I stated earlier, this is the time that Susman and the EC have the greatest leverage over our adversaries to push them into a favorable settlement. I think whatever he filed and/or whatever was discussed in chambers before Judge Walrath merely pushed them over the edge and into serious negotiations.

Oh, and as for Judge Walrath stating that she wanted to "move things along," I suspect she was referring to wrapping up this case - not getting started with it by virtue of the examiner's investigation.

MAKINGMOVES

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News