Mellon Research-If you are really concerned with enhancing shareholder value, why is basic information like the share structure being kept a secret from investors? Since you act as your own transfer agent I frankly doubt that complete records exist, or if they do exist that they are accurate.
Why have you not explained why aligining your company with the Dominion of Melchizedek, a group clearly established as being involved in world-wide financial fraud, was in the best interests of shareholders?
Could you explain how ERDTF, a defunct shell, was able to trade its worthless stock for mineral rights valued-at least by a Serbian Accountant in Serbia-at 68 billion dollars? Were you not aware that the chain of events involved in that acquisition lead directly back to Pearlasia/Gamboa and her former ventures and to Sandy Winick, her partner in crime? Do you think it was prudent to issue a press release valuing the stock you acquired in ERDTF at $50 million dollars plus?
What are the assets of RBBK, 10% of which you claim as assets? Since RiverBank is a DoM creation, those of us with suspicious minds think they are DoM notes. Prove us wrong.
Why have you not at least submitted a rebuttal to the RipOff Report author who alleges that you worked directly for Nico Botha, a felon, convicted and imprisoned for financial fraud, as a "scout", bringing him new marks and receiving a commission for doing so?
You repeatedly describe your company as providing "comprehensive boutique investment banking....." Can you name five deals MLON, or its either doppelganger or predecesor WSS has concluded?
The Wayback machine has extensive archival informatio on WSS and other names under your control, all of which were engaged in offshore 419 advance loan fee, HYI's-including fraudlent "Prime Bank" notes- and "Bank Guarantee" scams. These are criminal activities, and certainly call into question the veracity of any statements you make.
There are extensive posts on the current and archived Diligizer boards that you were forced to flee the UK due to pending charges of fraud. Can you refute this?
TIA for your thoughtful response.
