Intel Corp (INTC)

[spokeshave]

The Duke of URL: This is getting tiresome.

I have been told by many that it is common practice for Yousef to place things in quotation marks as a means of expressing opinion. Though this is a bit unorthodox and to the uninitiated can be misleading, I will stipulate that Yousef did not intend to mislead with his post. I have no experience with his(her?) idiosyncracies. I regret that anyone took offense to my reply.

But most importantly, it is your reasoning that offends. You intentionally start an argument over semantics to obfuscate the REAL issue.

My post had no reasoning in it. I was simply pointing out an error of attribution. I also had no intention to start an argument.

That is the very definition of fud, and it has no place on a valued BBS, although, Yahoo might be calling.

I suggest you look up FUD. You clearly do not understand its meaning. Furthermore, my opinions, comments, corrections, reasoning, or lack thereof have just as much place here as yours do.

The issue, as was so eloquently brought home to you, is that amd has had another phantom launch, and what seems to be mildly interesting is that they have not produced from the last phantom launch.

I never disputed this.

All this stuff is a waste of time and both vendors and POSTERS will get justifably mad, at having to waste time AND money and effort, qualifying parts which are not available to sell

Neither did I dispute this.

and.....taking the time to read and understand the reasoning or lack thereof of certain posts that choose to divert attention from the real issue!

Then I suggest you place me on that ignore thingy, or simply choose to not read my posts.