Intel Corp (INTC)

[The Duke of URL]

You said: "looked at my posts, trying to find something that I wrote that could be construed as provocation "

You don't have to look very far:

You said: "However, you do yourself and others a disservice by spreading lies about what the company said." And this is an exact quote, btw.

But most importantly, it is your reasoning that offends. You intentionally start an argument over semantics to obfuscate the REAL issue.

That is the very definition of fud, and it has no place on a valued BBS, although, Yahoo might be calling.

The issue, as was so eloquently brought home to you, is that amd has had another phantom launch, and what seems to be mildly interesting is that they have not produced from the last phantom launch.

[I guess you could say that there IS an AMD technological breakthrough here....AMD is the first company to apply Moore's Law to Phantom Launches. You can double the number of phantom launches every 18 months!!!! :))]

All this stuff is a waste of time and both vendors and POSTERS will get justifably mad, at having to waste time AND money and effort, qualifying parts which are not available to sell,

and.....taking the time to read and understand the reasoning or lack thereof of certain posts that choose to divert attention from the real issue!

Is that polite enough for you or may I just use short hand cut to the chase remarks, like usual.

BTW, the "problem" AMD has is that it is NORMAL to have low yeilds in the early stages of a new process,

BUT ALL THIS IS IS A SECURITIES LAW APPROVED WAY TO SAY, WE'RE FRIGGIN' LATE.

When the vendors get tired of being jerked around, as Yogi said, pigeons will come home to roost.