BioCurex, Inc.(fka BOCX)

[opportunityknocking]

I am a believer when I see with my own eyes all the buzz when I did a google search on Oncopet. The search included vets from across the US and Canada. There are hundreds, if not thousands more discussing Oncopet. Bottomline is word is spreading. IMO when Biocurex has licensed Oncopet our name will be associated with a pharmaceutical company that veterinarians are comfortable with, and the test will be utilized. Right now the skepticism is deserved, because we are an unfamiliar brand. Most are at the show me or prove it stage since it is not requiring FDA approval. Being a doctor myself that is the correct and understandable approach before bringing it into their practice. I am strongly under the impression that all the collected samples are being used to show the merit of the test and the data collected IMO is being presented to interested parties (Vets as well as pharmaceutical companies) as Mata has proposed.
I calmed down a little when I saw the amount of interested vets and the knowledge of the test raising curiosity among pet owners as well as doctors. For now I wish Dr Moro would explain to shareholders his intentions. Are we licensing the technology or is he going to do the testing and results in house? Is he going to do a 510K? (W/O the FDA approval recaf remains useless). IMO that was #1 on the list years ago. There is competition and patent expiration to worry about. As far as manipulation, when you trade on a bulsh@* exchange that trades like the wild west where the SEC could care less, you are are at the mercy of management to provide enough information to attract INVESTORS not day traders, by attending a variety of investor conferences and scientifc meetings, not just one or two a year. I am under the impression that we will get Oncopet licensed and it will give us much more credibility. IMO that is pretty much what this company HAS to do to become successful. If enough major parties are interested our name will get out there.
Regardless of Goldseeker's nonmedical point of view, which is all that it is, I see a much more positive reaction when I did my own search. Here is a few. I cannot understand Half still debating with someone that will NEVER admit when he is wrong. He is right only about one thing, he says I am not one of his fans. I'll give you that one. Here Gold, have some fun.
http://www.petconnection.com/blog/2010/04/15/can-a-simple-blood-test-diagnose-cancer-in-dogs/
http://locustvalleyvet.wordpress.com/2010/06/05/new-test-for-cancer-screening-in-animals/
http://www.doggedhealth.com/home/1791-recent-veterinary-breakthroughs.html?start=1
http://promega.wordpress.com/2010/05/12/an-early-detection-test-for-cancer-dogs-today-cats-tomorrow-soon-us/
http://petzmagazine.net/petzmagazine/noticias-mascotas/132-nuevo-analisis-para-detectar-cancer-en-los-perros.html
http://www.gopetplan.com/newsletter/201007/newsletter.aspx
http://www.caninek.org/Cancer.html
http://veterinarynews.dvm360.com/dvm/Veterinary+news/First-blood-test-unveiled-for-cancer-detection-in-/ArticleStandard/Article/detail/657623
http://www.wearethecure.org/index.php?mact=Search%2Ccntnt01%2Cdosearch%2C0&cntnt01returnid=15&cntnt01searchinput=oncopet
http://www.mypetcaretv.com/search-results.html?keywords=oncopet